The Biased Observer: Must we always demonize our political candidates?

Monday, February 1, 2016

Must we always demonize our political candidates?

The images of Donald Trump and swastikas and other Nazi images have suddenly become ubiquitous online. I will admit that Trump is not my favorite candidate and I don’t like much of what he says, but must we demonize him? Obama was portrayed as the Anti-Christ. Again, I don’t care for his political and personal views, but must we demonize him?

This whole line of characterization is not about the politicians but about our impotence as a nation to exercise the blessings of liberty with any degree of maturity. It is no wonder that democracies seldom survive more than 200 years.

I would like to remain the single exception to the demise of self government. Is anyone ready to be a responsible member of the electorate?

Let’s set aside our pettiness, acrimonious bickering, and national vitriol and get back on track preserving the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity. Let’s be the people we are blessed to be as Americans!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Many years ago, make that almost four decades ago, I wrote the unofficial school newspaper. Its name was The Biased Observer. As the name would indicate, it was more a look at events of the week through one set of eyes than any attempt to objectively report the news. The news was what old people watched. I was more concerned with issues closer to the heartbeat of humanity, such as how many times in one week was a high school cafeteria allowed to serve beans as the main course.

Through the years, I acquired some higher education, experience in many cultures, and some insight as to the workings of the mind. Today, I teach thinking skills and creativity among my other passions.

One thing that I have learned is that you just cannot look at something objectively. If someone says, let's look at this objectively, they mean let's look at this through my view of objectivity. We all perceive our surroundings differently. In parallel thinking, we separate the elements of thinking and focus on each of them separately and the product is a much more objective (and considerably more effective) examination of a topic or issue. Even with these specific tools, we never truly get to objectivity. Parallel Thinking enables us to broaden our base of objectivity, but we should realize that objectivity cannot be fully obtained. When I first used The Biased Observer as a title for my periodic accounts of the world, its purpose was to relieve me from any responsibility to apply critical examination to any of the topics I wanted to discuss.

I'll revive the title in this column as a realization that no matter how much objective effort is applied to a topic, it will always retain much of the bias of its author. But much like variety, the author's bias can be the spice of life.

This column will focus on a variety of topics, each seasoned with an assortment of spices. Its intent is to inspire, provoke, and occasional provide some relief from the issues of the week. I think you will enjoy it, but then again, I am a little biased.

The Biased Observer

Tom in Iraq as a Military Observer

Monday, February 1, 2016

Must we always demonize our political candidates?

No comments:

Post a Comment

A baseball story for every young boy...

I could not imagine having never read this book. Just read it!

What if all of the prophecy in the Bible had already been fulfilled? All of it!

These short stories are not for the timid.