The Biased Observer: Narcissist in Chief?

Friday, January 29, 2016

Narcissist in Chief?

Donald Trump did not attend what was the 7^th Republican televised debate. He made sure that would be the news of the day and that everyone would be talking about him. He held an event for veterans. Good for him. The problem is that Mr. Trump always does what is good for him.

This time veterans were there to be manipulated for his glory. He is trying to do the same with Christians but the reality is that it is all about him all the time. Washington has enough narcissists already. We surely don’t need a narcissist in chief.

Yes, Trump has donated to veterans causes before but to use his own words as he addressed his previous social and business relationship with Hillary Clinton, he expected something in return.

I am not thrilled about any of the candidates from either party. Each has their strength and weaknesses but Trump is consistent in everything being all about him. I expect to see his concern for veterans and Christians or whatever group he is courting on a given day to fade away as soon as it doesn’t satisfy his grandiose view of himself.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Many years ago, make that almost four decades ago, I wrote the unofficial school newspaper. Its name was The Biased Observer. As the name would indicate, it was more a look at events of the week through one set of eyes than any attempt to objectively report the news. The news was what old people watched. I was more concerned with issues closer to the heartbeat of humanity, such as how many times in one week was a high school cafeteria allowed to serve beans as the main course.

Through the years, I acquired some higher education, experience in many cultures, and some insight as to the workings of the mind. Today, I teach thinking skills and creativity among my other passions.

One thing that I have learned is that you just cannot look at something objectively. If someone says, let's look at this objectively, they mean let's look at this through my view of objectivity. We all perceive our surroundings differently. In parallel thinking, we separate the elements of thinking and focus on each of them separately and the product is a much more objective (and considerably more effective) examination of a topic or issue. Even with these specific tools, we never truly get to objectivity. Parallel Thinking enables us to broaden our base of objectivity, but we should realize that objectivity cannot be fully obtained. When I first used The Biased Observer as a title for my periodic accounts of the world, its purpose was to relieve me from any responsibility to apply critical examination to any of the topics I wanted to discuss.

I'll revive the title in this column as a realization that no matter how much objective effort is applied to a topic, it will always retain much of the bias of its author. But much like variety, the author's bias can be the spice of life.

This column will focus on a variety of topics, each seasoned with an assortment of spices. Its intent is to inspire, provoke, and occasional provide some relief from the issues of the week. I think you will enjoy it, but then again, I am a little biased.

The Biased Observer

Tom in Iraq as a Military Observer

Friday, January 29, 2016

Narcissist in Chief?

No comments:

Post a Comment

A baseball story for every young boy...

I could not imagine having never read this book. Just read it!

What if all of the prophecy in the Bible had already been fulfilled? All of it!

These short stories are not for the timid.