Let’s talk guns. Everyone else is breaking out their clichés for and against them, so let’s break the mold of immobilization and actually talk about the issues.
First in any discussion that pertains to guns is the fact that the crux of the discussion cannot be about the tragedy of the moment. The shooting of the week will surely bring the discussion to the forefront of the national discussion; but the two are separate issues.
There is senseless killing, very often accomplished with guns; and there is the issue of guns in America.
Let’s begin with the latter. The United States of America is a unique nation in that the right to bear arms is fundamental to our foundation. It is the second of ten initial amendments to our Constitution. It is integral to the operation of our system of government. It is not a standalone provision that may be removed without impacting the system.
If you don’t want satellite radio on your vehicle, then you don’t get it. The vehicle operates just as well. If you don’t want a suspension system; the ride might be much bumpier than you had anticipated.
If we want to have a national discussion on guns in America, then let’s do it in the proper arena—the constitutional arena. I find it odd that the National Rifle Association has emerged as the leading advocate of Second Amendment Rights.
How about the American Civil Liberties Union? What! Those guys won’t get anywhere near this. That’s too bad because the Second Amendment is the ultimate civil liberty.
If we want to restrict or do away with guns in this nation, we must first answer a fundamental question. Do we no longer fear tyranny or oppression from our own government? Our system of government was not set up for efficiency but for stability—that no branch or individual was able to seize too much power.
Do we no longer fear tyranny or oppression from our own government?
We must first answer this question before proceeding.
The right to bear arms is about throwing off a government that no longer represents the people. I hope that we never see that day, but if we do, a few handguns against the full force of whatever government has supplanted our republic won’t do the trick.
The very weapons that cause the most damage in these mass shootings are the ones that would be needed to overthrow an unjust government. Yes, if we are at odds with tyranny in our own government, we will need assault weapons not small caliber pistols to wrestle back our liberties.
Our government is a mess, but I don’t think we need a call to arms at this point; but the question is, “Must we preserve the power to overthrow our own government should it cease to be one that is of the people, by the people, and for the people?”
That’s a tough question. That is a gut wrenching question. That is a constitutional question not a matter for simple legislation or executive order. Constitution amendments are difficult by design, but not impossible. We have knocked out more than two dozen after the Bill of Rights. That’s an average of more than one each decade in the life of our young nation. It can be done. If it is important, it will be done.
It can be done and it should be difficult. We must decide if our duty to preserve the blessings of liberty not only for ourselves, but to our posterity, is at risk when we change the system. Make no mistake; changing the Second Amendment changes the entire system.
If we need to do this, then let’s do it as a constitutional amendment with the labyrinth of process that must accompany it. It should not be done lightly but if it is necessary, then let’s have a true national, constitutional discussion.
Knee jerk legislation and executive orders are not the answer.
But what about all of the people who will die while we are having this protracted constitutional dialogue?
Even without another law hitting the books, it is already illegal to murder one, two, or two dozen people. Whether it is done with a truck bomb, pipe bomb, or assault weapon; the malice aforethought is what is responsible for the killing.
We as a nation must once again value life. Black lives? Yes! Hispanic lives? Yes! Asian lives? Yes. Christian Lives? Yes! Lives of people who don’t even believe in God? Yes!
Unborn life? Yes!
Ouch! Let’s frame that as a woman’s right to choose.
Let’s not. Let’s look at it first from the sanctity of life. We don’t need more abortion laws or overturned court decisions. We need to value life from conception to the last breath.
We don’t do that! We do not value life. We get upset—for a while—when a couple dozen people are killed in a school or at a Christmas party or one person is shot by a police officer but by and large, our culture does not value life.
We must return to God and value the sanctity of life if we want to see the shootings and bombings and other recurring forms of human hatred stopped in our time.
If we need a constitutional discussion of the right to bear arms, then let’s have it. It needs to be one of the most robust discussions that we have ever engaged in as a nation. It will take at least a decade.
If we want to stop the senseless violence, then let’s stop it. This has to do with everyone—not just the faithful few—the modern day remnant—but everyone repenting of their selfish ways and returning to God.
Jesus broke it down to one command, that you love one another. This is what will stop the violence. This turning from the wickedness of this age can begin now. It doesn’t have to take a decade. Once we as a nation turn to God, he will draw near to us.
We will know his blessings.
The challenge is that this will take courage. Do we have enough men and women of courage left among us to lead us back to God?
Where are you men and women of courage?
Will you lead this nation back to God and out of this senseless violence?
Where are you?